Even in a world of ever-increasing employee tracking,Taiwan Microsoft knows it went too far.
The company announced Tuesday that, following widespread backlash, it will scale back recently announced additions to its suite of Microsoft 365 products. They let employers track employees' digital actions in granular detail under the guise of workplace efficiency.
Dubbed "Productivity Score," the tool was announced via blog post in October, but gained notoriety in late November when Wolfie Christl, a researcher and privacy advocate, called attention to some of its more odious capabilities.
"Employers/managers can analyze employee activities at the individual level (!)," wrote Christl on Nov. 24, "for example, the number of days an employee has been sending emails, using the chat, using 'mentions' in emails etc."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
We're talking about a lot of potential employee activities to monitor. Microsoft 365 (previously Office 365) includes access to such commonly used applications as Outlook, Excel, Word, and PowerPoint.
As Forbes reported in late November, with Productivity Score there are "73 pieces of granular data about worker behavior employers have access to, all associated with employees by name in a handy dashboard, according to Microsoft's own documentation."
Notably, even at launch Microsoft seemed aware that Productivity Score might be controversial.
"Let me be clear," wrote Jared Spataro, Microsoft 365's corporate vice president, in the initial October blog post, "Productivity Score is not a work monitoring tool."
And yet, as Tuesday's backtracking makes clear, there was — at the very least — the public perception of serious employee-monitoring potential with Productivity Score.
"During preview, we added a feature that showed end-user names and associated actions over a 28-day period," reads Tuesday's blog post, also by Jared Spataro. "In response to feedback over the last week, we're removing that feature entirely."
Spataro goes further, writing that "we're modifying the user interface to make it clearer that Productivity Score is a measure of organizational adoption of technology — and not individual user behavior."
SEE ALSO: How to check if your boss is monitoring your every keystroke
Importantly, Spataro makes clear that "feedback" — like, perhaps, a scathing Twitter thread from privacy advocate and author Corey Doctorow — contributed to the changes announced Tuesday.
"We appreciate the feedback we've heard over the last few days and are moving quickly to respond by removing user names entirely from the product," write Spataro. "This change will ensure that Productivity Score can't be used to monitor individual employees."
If only someone, maybe even someone high up at Microsoft 365, had considered that possibility before designing an entire product around that very thing.
Topics Cybersecurity Microsoft Privacy
Uma Thurman's story about Tarantino adds a whole other layer to #MeTooAmazon's Alexa can speak over loud situations with 'adaptive volume'TikTok bans searches for Milk Crate ChallengeGoogle Calendar to tell you how much time you've wast...err, spent in meetingsGoogle Calendar to tell you how much time you've wast...err, spent in meetingsWe saw this deadly 'Hong Kong' flu coming, but no one could stop itStrava users hit with apparent 'SEX Club' spamJames Comey blasts the release of Nunes memo in fiery tweetWatch as a recalled Chevy Bolt bursts into flames in a parking lot overnightInstagram search might finally start workingIt looks like God answered Michele Bachmann via billboard.11 best apps for going on a road tripChrissy Teigen casually trolls her hair stylist in Instagram commentsAmazon's Alexa can speak over loud situations with 'adaptive volume''Democracy dies in dankness' according to Trump Jr.Two galaxies create an eyeAre tracksuits cool now or is Armie Hammer trolling us?Video faceswaps Michael Scott with Donald Trump and the future is terrifyingSimple Google Maps tips and tricks that everyone should knowSamsung is making 200 Popular subreddits end their Reddit protest with *only* pictures of John Oliver Something We All Can Agree On: The Moon by The Paris Review Harry Potter and the Secret Gay Love Story by James Frankie Thomas How to split screen on Chromebook Spotify parts ways with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Is the internet bad for mental health? New study has an answer. Redux: The Old Juices Flowing by The Paris Review Political Fiction: Unraveling America at a West Wing Fan Convention A True Utopia: An Interview With N. K. Jemisin by Abigail Bereola Redux: The Shopping Mall of Loss by The Paris Review Poetry Rx: There’s No Going Home by Claire Schwartz The Epistolary Friendship of Guy Davenport and Hugh Kenner Letter to a Stranger by Remedios Varo Imagining a Free Palestine by George Abraham Ludmilla Petrushevskaya, Fabulist and Fabulous Singer by The Paris Review Rethinking Schiele by Cody Delistraty The Legibility of Fausto Reinaga by Mark Goodale Yan Lianke Illuminates Contemporary China by Carlos Rojas ChatGPT's 'make it more' is a new trend that takes images to their absolute limit The Faces of Ferrante by Miranda Popkey