"What's your love language?Taste of Younger Sister in law (2025)"
It's a question you've likely heard on and offline, with an answer many have seriously contemplated about themselves and their partners. As the theory goes, there are only five options for how people supposedly demonstrate and desire love: is it words of affirmation, physical touch, quality time, receiving gifts, or acts of service?
The theory of love languages, coined by Baptist preacher Gary Chapman in a book written over thirty years ago, is ubiquitous on the internet and IRL. The phrase is often used in conversations about love, TikTok quizzes have been dedicated to the question, and apps like Hinge have concocted romantic theories based on the idea.
SEE ALSO: TikTok has an obsession with testing friends and partners — and it needs to stopBut the idea of love languages may be largely unfounded, with little empirical backing, according to a new paper from researchers at the University of Toronto and York University. The study set out to unpack the heart of the love languages theory, based on Chapman's argument that the key to a successful romantic relationship is for partners to understand and speak each other's respective love languages. The five languages theory also assumes that each person has a primary love language, which means that they prioritize one way of expressing love over others.
The researchers found, however, that people tend to value each of the five languages in different contexts. They also emphasized that the languages "may not encompass all the meaningful ways that people express and feel love". Finally, the paper found "very little evidence" that partners with matching love languages fostered better relationships.
Chapman's credibility has been questioned before, largely because his notions are limited and constructed to apply only to heterosexual, cisgender, Caucasian, and Christian couples aligned with conservative, patriarchal gender roles. Emily Impett, one of the researchers from the University of Toronto, highlighted this: "One key thing to remember is that Chapman developed the five love languages by working with a sample of white, religious, mixed-gender, traditional couples. There are certain things that are left out, such as affirming a partner's personal goals outside of the relationship, which might be significant to couples with more egalitarian values."
The preacher has also been called out for instances of homophobia and aligning his theories with embedded misogyny.
And yet, love languages remain wildly popular. Chapman's book on the subject sold over 20 million copies worldwide. In online spaces, the theory has proliferated discourse on modern relationships. On TikTok, the hashtag #lovelanguage had over 3 billion views last year.
There could be a number of reasons why. For one thing, decades-old arguments on the keys to successful relationships have sparked newfound curiosity on the internet. Ideologies from the 2000s self-help guides – like Sherry Argov's 2002 book Why Men Love Bitchesand John Gray's 1992 bestseller Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus – have racked up millions of views on TikTok. Videos show TikTokkers reading out sections from these dating manuals, sometimes challenging outdated notions of dating but oftentimes reviving the rules that they tout.
For another, TikTok users simply love theories on love, from the invisible string theory to the moon phase trend to the latest orange peel theory. Each of these ideas question compatibility and a relationship's longevity, with catchy phrases to accompany them. But these philosophies can be inherently problematic, confining all relationships to boxed-in notions on what works and what doesn't.
As the latest research points out, people appreciate advice on improving relationships. There are so many ways to love and be loved, and TikTok pseudoscience can't encompass one of life's biggest mysteries.
Topics TikTok
Heroes of the Civil Service: An Interview with Antonin Baudry by Susannah HunnewellPaul Barbera’s Photos of Our OfficeThe light verse of Phyllis McGinley, born on this day in 1905.Celebrate the First Day of Spring with a PoemListen to Previously Unreleased Interviews with Paul Theroux, Peter Matthiessen, and MoreShad Season by Sadie SteinJonathan Lethem on Editing Don Carpenter’s Final ManuscriptThe Little Bookroom by Sadie SteinThe Morning News Roundup for April 16, 2014How to Save Frozen BooksTurn out the Lights and Watch Joško Marušić’s FisheyeThe Anniversary of the Road AtlasJohn Oliver gleefully weighs in on the TrumpEmancipation Carbonation by Dan PiepenbringA Week (or More) in Culture: Mimi Pond, Cartoonist by Mimi PondHeroes of the Civil Service: An Interview with Antonin Baudry by Susannah HunnewellPeter Matthiessen, 1927The Morning News Roundup for April 3, 2014The Little Bookroom by Sadie SteinThe Morning News Roundup for March 24, 2014 Jon Snow thinks men also face sexism in Hollywood J.K. Rowling just coined a Harry Potter version of 'splaining' and it's A+ England fans storm London IKEA after World Cup win over Sweden 5 dope TV marathons to watch when you're inside on the 4th of July Chris Evans should play a villain in his next movie Chrissy Teigen shares video of daughter dancing to a John Legend song Twitter sure is removing a lot of accounts these days Maisie Williams says goodbye to 'Game of Thrones' with suspense Sony mistakenly uploads entire movie on YouTube for free 'House of Cards' teaser sees Claire Underwood addressing the nation Southern Lights come to life in video from International Space Station MoviePass was down for hours, ruining everyone's Friday night Reports indicate Jawbone is selling speaker business [Updated] Artist brilliantly animates 'This Is America' using Apple computers from the '80s Report: Future iPhones won't use Intel's Wi Facebook labeled part of the Declaration of Independence as 'hate speech' Apple Music is beating Spotify in the US with more subscribers A man got his leg stuck in molten tarmac because the UK is basically melting New 'Fortnite' hack hits cheaters with dangerous malware Stumbleupon died right when we needed it the most
2.255s , 10133.265625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Taste of Younger Sister in law (2025)】,Warmth Information Network