Despite how much we all love it8 U.S.C 2257 Wikipedia is not a credible source. That's because any one can edit content at any time, adding in falsehoods that can sit there until, well, someone notices.
Case in point: a page dedicated to the bibliography of Hillary Clinton redirected to Adolf Hilter's autobiography Mein Kampfon Monday for over 16 hours.
SEE ALSO: Facebook isn't alone—moderating the internet is basically impossibleAccording to the edit history, the page was edited to redirect at 6:26 a.m. UTC, which is 2:26 a.m. ET. When you edit a Wikipedia entry, your IP address is logged and is publicly facing. We plugged that address into a tool that provides clues about who's behind the IP, including details about their Internet Service Provider.
Looking up the IP address, the editor of the post was using Comcast's internet service, somewhere near Mount Laurel, New Jersey when they made the changes. Looks like someone had a late night messing with Clinton's bibliography.
While problematic for Wikipedia and services that rely on its users for policing, this is sadly nothing new for the internet or the encyclopedia. Anyone can edit a Wikipedia article they want at any time, and the site depends on ethical people to correct those false edits to show accurate and up-to-date information. Trolling on Wikipedia isn't uncommon, though calling Clinton Hitler is a lot worse than editing the invertebrate page to include Paul Ryan.
In a time where "fake news" is a household phrase, and popular opinion -- not facts --can sway elections and the stock exchange, it's incredibly important that accurate information be out there on a site such as Wikipedia, even if this was just an unfunny and weak attempt at trolling.
To be fair to Wikipedia, this was not the Clinton's main page, but a sub page for books that she has penned located way at the bottom of her extremely extensive entry. Additionally, the bibliography page hasn't been edited in nearly a month.
It's unclear how often Clinton's page gets trolled, but it's indeed low-hanging fruit given Wikipedia's editing free-for-all. Wikipedia, which is monitored by tens of thousands of volunteer editors, has yet to respond to inquiries about the edit.
While Wikipedia is a massive site that gets a TON of readers every day, we could only find one tweet in reference to the edit.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
At 6:00 p.m. ET, just minutes after Mashable emailed a request for comment, the edit had been restored by Wikipedia user Gfoley4. According to their bio, they spend their time "on Wikipedia reverting vandalism, reviewing AFC submissions, and working on transit-related articles."
UPDATE: May 22, 2017, 5:40 p.m. PDT
A spokesperson for Wikipedia, the nonprofit that supports Wikipedia, responded to Mashable's request for comment, confirming that the page was vandalized, then restored by a volunteer editor.
Vandalism does happen from time to time on Wikipedia, but we find that the vast majority of articles are not vandalized. When vandalism does occur, it is typically reverted within minutes. In this case, the vandalism may have remained longer (less than 24 hours) because the article is relatively low traffic, averaging 34 pageviews per day.
Chelsea Clinton slams Trump in 'Teen Vogue' letter to her kidsApple's secret 'Marzipan' project could combine iOS and Mac appsApple reveals plans for Melbourne flagship, but locals have concernsEverything in Star Wars has a backstory, even Poe Dameron's jewelryElon Musk accidentally tweets phone number to Oculus executiveVirgin Hyperloop One hits record speed of 242 miles per hourUpdated Google News rule prohibits websites from hiding origin countryLondon company created a rage room to get your holiday anger out#MeToo creator Tarana Burke will drop the Times Square ball on New Year's EveHulu study finds viewers coped with 2017 by watching comedyEU court's ruling is another tough hit for UberThis is how the 'Simpsons' house would fare on 'House Hunters'Microsoft surprises a thoughtful 9Rian Johnson explains why the ending of 'Last Jedi' is all about LukeFacebook is the biggest social network. Now, it's trying to become the best.Secure messaging app Signal is the most important app of 2017Samsung Galaxy S9 will be announced in February 2019, report saysRefugee mother tells her family's story in powerful animated videoAndrew Joyner honors the Women's March with new book 'The Pink Hat'The best iPhone and Android apps of 2017 Melissa McCarthy makes a better Sean Spicer than Sean Spicer on 'SNL' Google Docs: A modern tool of powerful resistance in Trump's America 'The Lego Batman Movie' is a pop Donald Trump left his Super Bowl watch party when the Patriots were losing This app connects refugees to volunteer translators via Facebook Messenger Shyamalan's 'Split' tries to hold off 'Rings' at the box office A briefing on the history of Snapchat updates Ed Sheeran says 'Game of Thrones' cast crashed his underground drinking den 19 totally rational fears every New Yorker has Google will kill its beloved Android launcher Snapchat announces new 'Planet Earth II' show Facebook users mark themselves safe at Kellyanne Conway's fake Bowling Green Massacre Watch the exciting 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' Super Bowl spot Why your iPhone battery meter sometimes goes haywire Amazon Prime Air drone makes an appearance during the Super Bowl How to use Google Calendar’s smart meeting scheduler A forgotten 1986 novel predicted a terrible Trump Dudes hailed heroes on Facebook after livestreaming sports match Trump and Obama's first Super Bowls as president looked very different How the city of Atlanta finally fell in love with Falcons quarterback Matt Ryan
1.4186s , 10137.375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【18 U.S.C 2257】,Warmth Information Network