Facebook,Lady Moon Google, and Twitter are facing a lot of difficult questions over their ad policies after it came to light this week that all three companies allowed advertisers to run targeted ads based on hate speech.
Though the circumstances around each case were slightly different, each one was the result of a mostly-automated system that allowed advertisers to buy ads targeted toward people likely to respond to hate speech and other offensive language.
And, in each case, the companies claimed that it wasn't supposed to happen. Yet the fact that media outlets were able to buy ads for these terms so easily, and in such quick succession, highlights how little these companies -- who count themselves among the biggest tech giants -- were doing to prevent this from happening in the first place.
SEE ALSO: Facebook let advertisers buy ads targeting 'Jew haters'In Facebook's case, ProPublica reporters found that they could buy ads targeting people who were likely to respond to "Jew haters" and other anti-Semitic words and phrases. Soon after, BuzzFeedreported that it was able to buy Google search ads based on racist and anti-Semitic search queries, including "Black people ruin everything."
Then, The Daily Beastreported that it was able to buy ads on Twitter targeting people who were "likely to respond to" terms like "Nazi" and a derogatory word typically aimed at undocumented Mexicans living in the United States.
To be clear, all three companies have policies that prohibit hate speech. Facebook and Twitter ban or suspend people who promote hate speech. Google has a similar policy in place for developers and others who use its platforms.
all three companies have policies that prohibit hate speech
Despite this, all three allowed ads to be purchased based on hate speech that would otherwise be banned from their platforms. That says far more about each company's priorities than the policies themselves -- or their apologies after fact.
In all three cases, the companies were quick to apologize and say that these cases were the exception, rather the rule.
"We prohibit advertisers from discriminating against people based on religion and other attributes. However, there are times where content is surfaced on our platform that violates our standards," Facebook's Director of Product Management Rob Leathern said in a statement. (Later, the company announced that it was removing the feature that allows users' self-reported interests to be listed in advertising categories entirely.)
Google's SVP of Ads, Sridhar Ramaswamy, also apologized, saying: "Our goal is to prevent our keyword suggestions tool from making offensive suggestions, and to stop any offensive ads appearing."
Similarly, a Twitter spokesperson said that the offensive terms in question "have been blacklisted for several years" and that the company is "looking into" why their filters didn't prevent the ad campaign from running.
While these companies are right to take this seriously, it's difficult to accept their explanations when this is a problem that could be avoided relatively easily. Blocking hate speech from advertising platforms should not be a difficult problem for these companies, which employ many of the industry's top engineers, to solve.
the fact that this hasn't been solved yet says more about these companies' priorities than anything else
Facebook is working on brain-controlled computers. Google practically invented self-driving cars. Twitter's CEO is one of the most lionized founders in tech (and one who has claimed that fixing harassment and hate speech is a top priority.)
Again, the fact that this hasn't been solved yet says more about these companies' priorities than anything else.
As others have pointed out, what all of these companies also have in common is that their entire business depends on a steady flow of ad revenue. Making easy-to-use tools that allow anyone to buy ads in just a few clicks is core to everything they do.
And while none of these companies want to be seen as profiting off the vile hate speech meant to appeal to the internet's basest trolls, it's not difficult to see how advertising policies could face less scrutiny than, say, those applied to users or developers.
That needs to change. The time for lame excuses and half-hearted apologies is over. The biggest tech companies in the world are more than capable of fixing this. It's time that they do.
Topics Facebook Google X/Twitter Advertising
Scarlett Johansson exits trans man role in 'Rub & Tug'J.K. Rowling pleads with Harry Potter fans to keep 'Cursed Child' spoilers under wrapsPapa John's is removing disgraced founder from its logo12 Russians indicted for DNC hack, officially placing foreign blame on 2016 email attackThese deeply weird pool floats will keep your drinks safe this summerHere are nine of the most memorable celebrity Instagram photosLaila Ali shares sweet photo of her dad with his granddaughterHere are the best tweets from the past weekU.S. government investigating Uber for gender discriminationFrance's Kylian Mbappé becomes youngest in decades to score during World Cup finalBuzzFeed CEO compares Trump to cigarettes, pulls RNC ad campaignIn J.K. Rowling's tribute, Muhammad Ali's word speak for themselves'Queer Eye' is moving to Missouri for its justSacha Baron Cohen's new show: Is it worth watching?Lava bomb hits tour boat in Hawaii and injures 23 peopleSpace photo shows forests devastated by loggingHere are 10 items to keep an eye out for on Amazon Prime DayThe internet might make ADHD symptoms worse for teensSolange repurposes her dry cleaning bags as an elegant dance uniformThe best Amazon Prime Day USB Amazon expands its Echo Frames with sunglasses and blue light lenses What We’re Loving: Don B., B. Dole, /u/backgrinder by The Paris Review Reddit now works better for folks who aren't logged in See elBulli Chef Ferran Adrià’s Food Drawings The Morning News Roundup for February 25, 2014 Elon Musk's X, formerly Twitter, reinstates Kanye West's account Switch back to the old Twitter bird logo from X with this iOS feature Pork Products in the Work of Harper Lee Happy Birthday, Gabriel García Márquez Recapping Dante: Canto 18, or Beware the Bolognese by Alexander Aciman The Expression of Not Wordle today: Here's the answer and hints for July 30 QAnon believers go undercover to spread conspiracies online…and it’s working A Look at Bloomingdale’s “Saturday’s Generation” Bizarre History Lessons from an 1897 Children’s Magazine Look at These Colorful Diagrams of Famous First Sentences from Literature Do we have any control over what the post 'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for August 2 Irish health system shuts down following ransomware attack Tonight: Join Us for an AWP Happy Hour by Dan Piepenbring