If at first you don't succeed...
Twitter announced Wednesday an update to its ongoing effort to pare back the volume of what it deems to976 Archivestoxic replies sloshing around the social media platform. Specifically, starting May 5 on the Twitter iOS app and shortly thereafter on the Android app, English-language users may be shown "improved prompts" asking them to rethink their typed-but-not-yet-sent replies in a new — and presumably more nuanced — set of circumstances.
Wednesday's announcement signals an evolution of an experiment first announced in May of 2020. Distinct from, but related in spirit to, Twitter's "humanization prompts" test, the idea as initially explained by Twitter in 2020 was that sometimes people benefit from taking a deep breath before tweeting.
"When things get heated, you may say things you don't mean," explained the company at the time. "To let you rethink a reply, we're running a limited experiment on iOS with a prompt that gives you the option to revise your reply before it's published if it uses language that could be harmful."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Notably, prompted users could still tweet whatever nonsense they wanted — they just had to deal with an additional step thrown in the mix by Twitter first.
At the time, the system was called out by some for being perhaps a bit too blunt in its deployment of gentle scolding.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Now, Twitter says it's learned from those early day.
"In early tests, people were sometimes prompted unnecessarily because the algorithms powering the prompts struggled to capture the nuance in many conversations and often didn't differentiate between potentially offensive language, sarcasm, and friendly banter," read the press release in part.
As for what Wednesday's announcement means in practice? Well, a few things.
Twitter says the updated system now takes into consideration the relationship between the person writing the reply and the account at which it's directed. In other words, replies between two accounts that have long exchanged friendly missives might be treated differently than a first-time reply directed at an account the user doesn't follow.
The company also claims its systems can now more accurately detect profanity, and can distinguish — at least to some extent — context. Twitter, for example, lists "Adjustments to our technology to better account for situations in which language may be reclaimed by underrepresented communities and used in non-harmful ways" as one of the ways in which its prompts system has been improved since the initial rollout of the test last year.
And while this all sounds a bit Sisyphean, Twitter insists its past prompting efforts have actually shown tangible results.
SEE ALSO: Twitter tests 'humanization prompts' in effort to reduce toxic replies
"If prompted, 34% of people revised their initial reply or decided to not send their reply at all," claims the company's press release. "After being prompted once, people composed, on average, 11% fewer offensive replies in the future."
Twitter, in other words, says these prompts work. Whether or not its oft-harassed users will agree is another thing altogether.
Topics Social Media X/Twitter
Why Maybelline deleted a tweet about abandoning Snapchat for InstagramSamsung Galaxy S9 and S9+: New smartphone photos leaked'The Walking Dead' cast and fans react to Carl's final episodeFCC chairman who killed net neutrality given gun and award from NRAE! stands by Ryan Seacrest as new details of alleged misconduct emergeDisney donating $1 million to STEM programs following 'Black Panther' successApple reportedly releasing 'largest iPhone ever' this yearDisney donating $1 million to STEM programs following 'Black Panther' successWe tried out the LG V30s and its AIApple reportedly releasing 'largest iPhone ever' this yearTesla is donating electric car chargers to select U.S. officesJennifer Lawrence couldn't get into 'Phantom Thread''The Walking Dead' cast and fans react to Carl's final episodeScary footage shows woman plunging into frozen lake to rescue stranded dogHe fooled an entire nation with a fake Facebook profile. Then I tracked him down.This wicked concept phone solves all of iPhone X's problemsWhat's coming to (and going from) Netflix in March'The Walking Dead' cast and fans react to Carl's final episode'A Wrinkle in Time' social media silence speaks volumesBMW's new smartphone car key means you better not lose your phone Several dead after explosion reported at Ariana Grande concert Microsoft unveils a Surface Pro 4 successor, and it’s not the Pro 5 Pete Souza pauses the Trump shade to photograph President Underwood in D.C. 'Red Dead Redemption 2' delayed, but we get new screenshots 'Come From Away' is the musical about 9/11 everyone is talking about. Here's why. Kylo Ren looks as emo as ever on 'Vanity Fair' 'Star Wars' cover Katy Perry's album trailer feels like a weird online dating profile 'Spider Trump and Netanyahu didn't want this selfie, but it happened anyway iPhone 9 leaks are here, whether you're ready or not Ryan Adams is announcing tour dates with a 'Lord of the Rings' tribute 8 fun 'Bachelorette' contestants who unfortunately didn't make the final cast 'Nancy' isn't a person, it's a podcast. Oh, and it's super, super gay. The sad, bizarre reason why The Man From Another Place isn't in 'Twin Peaks' Twitter's shareholders meeting was the same old hatefest — except for two things Sony hackers linked to WannaCry ransomware Instagram update adds location and hashtag Stories Woman confronts alt Alec Baldwin's young daughter has her own Trump impression in the works Could Game of Thrones eventually be 20
1.6346s , 10132.1640625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【1976 Archives】,Warmth Information Network