Google Home smart speakers,best books on eroticism the company dryly warns in a note buried deep on a support page, can "incorrectly" record their users even when they haven't first said an activating wake phrase like "hey, Google." It just so happens that, at least for a brief period of time this summer, those microphone-enabled devices were doing exactly that.
The company admitted Monday, following a report by Protocol, that it had updated an unspecified number of Google Assistant-enabled devices to respond to auditory cues beyond the user-specified wake phrase. Google told Protocol this was a mistake that was quickly fixed, but did not appear to address the larger privacy concerns that such a mistake signifies. After all, how are users supposed to trust a live microphone in their home if someone can remotely update it to be even more invasive without their knowledge?
This is not the first time that Google Assistant-enabled products have acted contrary to whatever stated privacy protections they had. In July 2019, we learned that not only were Google Homes recording users, unprompted, but that some of those recordings were then sent to real humans to listen to. Amazon's Alexa-enabled devices were also doing this, as was Facebook's Portal. (Following a backlash, Google announced users could opt in to something called "Voice & Audio Activity," which permits people to listen to your Google Assistant recordings.)
Understandably, then, any change to a Google device that makes it more prone to activate and possibly record users is worth scrutinizing — a difficult task when the update is made behind closed doors.
The development was flagged by a Redditor, who noticed their Google Assistant-enabled device was listening for a smoke alarm, and, after hearing it, had a pre-programed set of actions ready to go.
"Burned something in the kitchen and the cheap $10 smoke detector went off," wrote Reddit user Brazedowl, who noticed the change and shared a screenshot of the notification. "Then I got a notification on my phone that Google heard the smoke detector going off."
While it's not 100 percent clear, it's possible someone at Google jumped the gun ahead of a new partnership with security company ADT. Enabling Google devices to pick up on smoke alarms sounds like just the thing such a partnership would herald. And, as Protocol mentions, Google Nest speakers do actually listen for "critical sounds" like alarms or glass breaking, as part of the Nest Aware subscription service.
"A recent software update enabled these alerts on some of our speakers that didn't have a [Nest Aware] subscription," a spokesperson told Protocol, "but we've since rolled that back."
We reached out to Google with a host of questions about this supposedly mistaken update. Specifically, when did this update go into effect, and how many devices were altered? What user data, if any, was collected as a result of this and what was done with it?
Unfortunately, we received no immediate response. In a world where approximately 24 percent of American adults have smart speakers, that leaves a lot of people with unanswered questions.
SEE ALSO: A new Alexa jamming device for people who don't own a hammer
It's important, after all, to know if Google intends to make similar unannounced changes to its products in the future. Because even if a company spokesperson swears this was a one-off mistake, knowing what Google does with customer information gathered through accidental invasive recordings is invaluable.
After all, when it comes to technology pushing further and further into the home, mistakes are bound to happen again. And again.
Topics Google Assistant Google Home
Photos of Our 2014 Spring RevelSadie Stein on the Things We Are Supposed to LoveWebb telescope stares into a galaxy that's long intrigued scientists'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for August 6Webb telescope stares into a galaxy that's long intrigued scientists'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for August 8Wordle today: Here's the answer and hints for August 6The FCC just fined a robocall company $300 millionHinge, Tinder, OkCupid encourage UK daters to show COVIDPeter Matthiessen, 1927AI automation still poses accessibility issues, especially for audio transcriptionOn Knowing Things'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for August 7Sadie Stein on Philip Larkin’s Poem “The Trees”How to celebrate your first Pride'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for August 5‘Barbie’ tops $1 billion and a new record for female directorsThe Morning News Roundup for April 3, 2014Read Frederick Seidel’s Poem “Arabia”AI automation still poses accessibility issues, especially for audio transcription Think Like a Mountain—Aldo Leopold’s Path to Conservationism Twitter/X removes option to report posts for 'misleading information' Staff Picks: Baseball Cards, Barbarian Days, Blow OpenAI is reportedly working on an 'iPhone of AI' — whatever that means My Grandmother’s Wheelchair by Stephen Hiltner John Ashbery on Movies We're watching the return of the tears of joy emoji Designing a Better Flannery O’Connor Postage Stamp An Artist Found the Fountain of Youth—It’s Not What You Want Solving Agatha Christie’s Mysteries with Data Disney+ is already cracking down on password sharing in Canada UK government to introduce porn age verification Hart Crane’s Bizarre, Audacious Unpublished Poem Why I use a running app to track my feelings Twitter/X just fired half of its election integrity team The 11 best and funniest tweets of the week, including disrespectful plants and the mall 'Saw X' review: A surprisingly sentimental splatter Meta Connect 2023: AI celebrities, Meta AI, and all the other AI features When Paperback Covers Get It Wrong—Very Wrong Did Herman Melville’s Mother Make Him Watch Her Sleep?
2.3673s , 8286.28125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【best books on eroticism】,Warmth Information Network